Support Us

A measure of impact for every dollar spent, cost-effectiveness evidence powers better program design, implementation, and ultimately greater impact of global development and humanitarian assistance interventions.

CEGA Work Theme - Cost-Effectiveness

Motivation

Cost-effectiveness is a measure of impact for every dollar spent on a particular population, and it’s a catalytic engine that can drive greater outcomes across a range of global development and humanitarian assistance programming.

The scale of challenges facing decision makers around the world has outpaced the resources at their disposal. With limited budgets, constrained staff resources, and shifting geopolitical relationships, leaders need better and more relevant information about how best to achieve their outcomes of interest. Causal evidence can point the way.

Unfortunately, impact evaluations (like randomized control trials) only reveal part of the picture. Cost evidence is essential for policymakers to decide how to allocate scarce resources. Yet, fewer than one in five impact evaluations integrates cost evidence.

As more and more decision makers prioritize robust, experimental evidence in the design and implementation of development interventions and humanitarian aid, cost-effectiveness data promises to transform how organizations allocate their budgets, ensuring every dollar achieves maximum impact.

Learn more in this USAID position paper on cost-effectiveness.

 

Advancing Cost-Effectiveness

CEGA is at the forefront of the movement to build cost-effectiveness into impact evaluations. For years, we have invested in improving the market for cost data by generating cost data, building research capacity, creating tools, empowering users, and convening the existing costing community.

Learn more and sign up for the Costing Community of Practice.

Partners
  • USAID
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation
Scientific Directors

Initiatives

Cost Transparency Initiative

Motivation Cost evidence is essential for policymakers to decide how to allocate scarce resources across impactful programs. Yet, fewer than one in five impact evaluations integrates cost evidence—such as by including a cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) or cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of the evaluated program (Brown and Tanner, 2019). The lack of attention to costing from researchers limits the influence of impact evidence by making it less relevant to decision maker’s concerns. Moreover, a dearth of costing evidence inhibits policymakers’ ability to identify and implement the most...

Promoting Impact and Learning with Cost-Effectiveness Evidence (PILCEE)

PILCEE is a major investment by USAID to improve its efforts to fight global poverty and promote economic growth with cost-effectiveness...

Cost-Effectiveness Research

Transparency

Healthy Diets Costing Study (Lishe Bora)

Elizabeth Brown | Tanzania
Browse more Cost-Effectiveness Research

Cost-Effectiveness Resources

Browse more Cost-Effectiveness Resources

News

News

Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved

Design & Dev by Wonderland Collective