Skip to content

What Would It Cost to End Extreme Poverty?

Jeff Ackley on unsplash

Credible new estimates suggest that ending poverty would be surprisingly affordable

A new study showcases how recent advances in statistical learning could help to revitalize the global fight against extreme poverty. It estimates that simply providing direct income transfers sufficient to lift almost everyone above the $2.15/day poverty line would cost just 0.3% of global GDP. This offers one simple and surprisingly affordable path toward eradicating poverty.

Key Findings

  • Ending approximately all extreme poverty would cost around 0.3% of global GDP. These new estimates  capture how much it would cost to directly transfer enough income to each household to bring almost all of them above the $2.15/day poverty line.
  • Costs in context. This figure is around 50% more than was (until recently) spent on foreign aid, but around 1/7 as much as the world spends each year on alcoholic beverages.
  • Old data, new methods. By applying state-of-the-art statistical learning methods to the kinds of data governments already collect, the study is able to move beyond hypotheticals and provide benchmarks that can guide real-world decisions. The approach also demonstrates how artificial intelligence can be harnessed to address pressing social issues
  • Smarter targeting saves billions. A universal basic income (UBI) set at the extreme poverty line would cost about five times the cost of the data-driven approach.  In most countries, data-driven targeting can thus reduce poverty by the same amount as UBI at a fraction of the cost.

“The numbers tell us it isn’t crazy to set our sights on a big, ambitious goal,” said Paul Niehaus, professor of Economics at UC San Diego and co-author of the study. “That’s partly because extreme poverty has already fallen so much in recent decades, alongside economic growth, but also because advances in data science have made it possible to design shovel-ready policies that get the most help to the poorest people.”

Costs in Context
  • Bottom line. Eradicating global extreme poverty using data-driven targeting would cost about $318 billion per year. See FAQ for details.
  • Global perspective. This cost amounts to just one-third of one percent of global GDP — somewhat more than was previously spent on foreign aid (0.21%), but a fraction of what the world already spends on alcohol (2.2%) or cosmetics (0.6%).
  • An individual perspective. For an individual earning the median U.S. personal income of $45,000, 0.3% of income would work out to a personal contribution of about $135/year.
  • Philanthropic potential. With today’s levels of private wealth, over one hundred individuals could end poverty in an entire country by committing the earnings on their assets. See FAQ for details.
Learn More & Engage
About the Authors

The study was conducted by Roshni Sahoo (Stanford University), Joshua Blumenstock (UC Berkeley), Paul Niehaus (UC San Diego), Leo Selker (UC Berkeley), and Stefan Wager (Stanford University). Their work integrates economics, statistical learning, and global development.

Publication Details

Sahoo, Blumenstock, Niehaus, Selker, and Wager. 2025. What Would It Cost to End Extreme Poverty?  NBER Working Paper #34583.

Press Coverage

Herschander, Sara. 2025. “The Low, Low Cost of Ending Extreme Poverty.” Vox (Future Perfect), December 17, 2025.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/472422/the-low-low-cost-of-ending-extreme-poverty.

Media Contacts

For more information or to arrange interviews, contact Joshua Blumenstock at jblumenstock@berkeley.edu.